Latest news & site updates Information Articles & interviews Photo gallery Video clips Interact Site info & links


8th February: Side Effects released (US)
15th March: Side Effects released (UK)

There are 445 fans listed in the Steven Soderbergh fanlisting. If you're a Soderbergh fan, add your name to the list!


Information | Photos | Official website Released: 2020

Information | Photos | Official website Released: 2020


Now available from

Now available from

DVDs that include an audio commentary track from Steven:
Clean, Shaven - Criterion Collection
Point Blank
The Graduate (40th Anniversary Collector's Edition)
The Third Man - Criterion Collection
Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?



Soderbergh on Directing Traffic
By Jon Silberg
(Directors World, February 8, 2001)

Steven Soderbergh followed up the extremely successful Erin Brockovich with a sweeping epic based on BBC miniseries Traffik.

Traffic combines a number of narratives held together by the theme of drug trafficking. Though the film's ensemble cast includes Michael Douglas, Benicio Del Toro and Catherine Zeta-Jones - and despite the budget in the neighborhood of $50 million - Soderbergh said he maintained the same level of independence and creative control that he's had on all of his films, from the crowd-pleasing Brockovich and Out of Sight to more personal projects such as sex, lies and videotape and Kafka. Soderbergh puts a personal stamp on all aspects of his productions, going so far as to take on the role of cinematographer and A-camera operator on Traffic.

What was it that interested you in adapting this BBC mini-series? Was it the subject matter of drug trafficking or the dramatic potential or both?
A little bit of both. I've been interested in making a movie about this issue for a long time - as long as it didn't become a screed. Part of the genius of the original series was the three separate narratives, which gave you an upstairs-downstairs view of a pretty complicated problem.

Was there ever a concern about cutting back and forth between stories that barely intersect or did you decide that that's how the material had to be presented?
Well, the only thing more dangerous than not having the stories intersect is having them intersect in a way that feels lame. There were a couple of occasions in which you got this sense that the characters were crossing paths but we didn't want to force it. I felt like the audience could intuit the impact that one story had on another. There are enough unifying elements to keep you feeling like the world of the film has a design to it.

A lot of Traffic - especially the Mexican parts - has a kind of a "documentary" feel. I mean did you cover a lot of action all sorts of ways and figure it out in post like you were really doing a documentary, or were you pretty clear on how you were going to cover the action when you went in?
I was reasonably clear how things would be blocked. The only times we hauled out more than two cameras was when we were doing some sort of action sequence. The shoot-out at the storage facility at the beginning and the car blowing up - that was about it for using many cameras. Other than that it was just an A and a B camera running all the time. I was in charge of the cinematography and I operated the A camera.

What made you decide to take on those responsibilities?
I don't know. I think I'd been moving in that direction for a while and had worked with some very good cinematographers and kept my eyes open. Because of the run-and-gun style that I was after it seemed like if I was ever going to make the leap, this was the movie to make it on. And you know a good 50 to 60% of this film is shot on available light. There isn't a shot where the film wasn't pushed. A lot of the film was 5289 pushed to EI 1200. It didn't involve a lot of elaborate lighting set-ups.

Most of the film was hand-held, wasn't it?
Almost all of it. We used Panavision's Millennium XL, which is an excellent camera. It's incredibly compact.

Each storyline has a unique look. What did you do to get each of those looks?
For the Mexican sections we were shooting 5289 through a tobacco filter and overexposing it quite a bit. All of it was shot at a 45-degree shutter angle too. Then we took it to Cinesite (Hollywood) and digitized it using the Philips DataCine. We tweaked the digital version and desaturated it a little and then filmed it out to Ektachrome to add a lot of contrast. Then we struck a negative from that. For the sections in Washington, DC, we shot the 89 again without the 85 filter so it had this kind of cold blue feel to it. And for the San Diego sections, we shot on 5279, which is much less contrasty than the 89. Then, to further reduce contrast, we flashed the film and put a lot of diffusion on the lens.

What made you choose to use such different methods within the film?
Oh, just to give it a different feeling. You know, it was just a gimmick really, but I wanted to make sure that when we cut from one story to the other that the audience knows immediately where they are.

I imagine shooting handheld gave you some freedom about how to frame a shot. Did you try to cut down on the use of booms and microphones for audio? Did you use a lot of wireless microphones on actors' clothes?
No. Sometimes we would, but I try to avoid wirelesses microphones whenever possible because they just don't sound as good. We had a great production mixer, Paul Ledford - who I've worked with many times now - and a couple of really good boom operators and I explained when we started that it wasn't about perfection; it was about energy and emotion. Everybody knew that they just had to roll with it.

Did you take advantage of the sound mixing capabilities of the Avid during editing?
Oh, yeah, it was great. We did a lot of work in ProTools during the picture editing. And we used a great deal of it in the final mix directly from the ProTools workstations.

Does that help you with the picture cutting - to be working with more than just production sound?
It helps because you can experiment with everything at once and then, things that you like are sort of done and you don't end up duplicating labor down the road. You've got your sound files ready to take to the mix.

Where did you do your sound mix?
At Swelltone Laboratories in New Orleans. Larry Blake mixes all my stuff and he's part owner of Swelltone. We went there because we were lashing together four ProTools workstations with other automation and mixing right out of the original edit sessions onto a hard drive. It's still hard to find mixing stage in L.A. that can do that.

That's surprising.
We used the original files that the sound editors worked with and saved all the automation and eq and we just plugged all that into the mixing board. It's definitely the future of movie audio and I think people will be ready to do it soon, but we couldn't find a place available that was willing to sort of tear up the way they were used to working and let us come in and implement this technology. They just said, "Look that's not the way we do it." They're used to having a couple of workstations standing by but this was the entire movie being mixed top to bottom out of the original edit sessions with the eq and the automation that was done for the temp mixes. We never duplicated any labor. Anything that I liked from the temp mix was in the movie without being touched.

One of the interesting things we did do in the mix - I don't think anybody will necessarily notice this - was, with the exception of the music, the entire movie is in mono. We decided to do that late in the game. Larry said, "I think it's weird with the aesthetic of the movie to have these wide stereo background and effects tracks." He said, "We ought to dump everything into the center channel to give it the documentary feel that you're going after." And I said, "I think you're right." So everything except for the music is nailed to the center.

Your next film (Ocean's Eleven) is about to start shooting, right?
The first week of February.

And are you shooting it and operating again yourself?
Yes I am.

With the Millennium XL again?

Are you paying homage to the kind of late-60s style of the original?
No. It's set present day and I hope it'll have a new feeling to it. But it's too early to talk about it. I'm still working out exactly how I'm going to do it.


Latest news & updates  -  Information  -  Articles & interviews  -  Photo gallery  -  Video clips  -  Interact  -  Site info & links

Steven Soderbergh Online is an unofficial fan site and is not in any way affiliated with or endorsed by Mr. Soderbergh or any other person, company or studio connected to Mr. Soderbergh. All copyrighted material is the property of it's respective owners. The use of any of this material is intended for non-profit, entertainment-only purposes. No copyright infringement is intended. Original content and layout is Steven Soderbergh Online 2001 - date and should not be used without permission. Please read the full disclaimer and email me with any questions.